A Dollar Saved: The Science of Stopping a Lawn Disease Before it Starts

How precision timing and spray volume are revolutionizing the fight against dollar spot in turfgrass management.

Turf Science Fungicide Research Precision Agriculture

The Golfer's Nemesis

Imagine a perfect putting green—a flawless, emerald carpet that rolls as true as glass. Now, imagine it blighted by small, straw-colored patches that merge into ugly, scarred areas. This is the work of dollar spot, one of the most persistent and destructive diseases in the world of golf course turf.

For superintendents, fighting dollar spot is a relentless, costly battle. But what if the key to winning wasn't just in what you spray, but how and when you spray it? Recent research delves into the precise science of early intervention, revealing that the secret to a cure lies in a perfectly timed, perfectly delivered pre-emptive strike.

The Fungus Among Us: Understanding Dollar Spot

Dollar spot is caused by the fungal pathogen Clarireedia jacksonii (formerly Sclerotinia homoeocarpa). This fungus doesn't create dramatic mushrooms or toadstools; instead, it works silently, producing enzymes that break down the waxy coating and cell walls of grass blades.

The result is the characteristic "hourglass" lesion—a thin, bleached band across a green blade—that eventually kills the tissue.

Ideal Conditions

Thrives in cool, moist conditions with warm days and cool nights with heavy dew.

Visual Symptoms

Characteristic "hourglass" lesions on grass blades and small straw-colored patches.

Early Intervention

Acting at the first sign of infection is crucial to prevent significant damage.

The Crucial Experiment: Timing and Volume

A pivotal study sought to answer two critical questions for early curative control of dollar spot in creeping bentgrass.

Research Question 1

Does the timing of the first fungicide application, relative to the first observed symptoms, affect its success?

Research Question 2

Does the volume of water used to deliver the fungicide (spray volume) influence its efficacy?

Methodology: A Step-by-Step Scientific Siege

The Plot

Multiple small plots of creeping bentgrass were maintained under fairway-height conditions, perfect for encouraging dollar spot.

The Trigger

The plots were monitored daily for the very first visual signs of dollar spot infection—the initial appearance of those small, silver-dollar-sized patches.

The Treatments

Once symptoms appeared, researchers initiated fungicide applications with different delays and at different spray volumes.

Timing Variables
  • 0 days after symptom appearance
  • 1 day after symptom appearance
  • 2 days after symptom appearance
Spray Volume Variables
  • Low volume: 0.5 gal/1000 ft²
  • Higher volume: 2.0 gal/1000 ft²

The Measurement

The researchers measured the percentage of turf area covered by dollar spot over the following weeks to see how effectively each strategy controlled the outbreak.

Results and Analysis: Every Hour Counts

Key Finding: The results were striking and delivered a clear message: speed is everything, and delivery matters.

The data showed that applying the fungicide immediately upon seeing the first symptom (0-day delay) provided near-perfect control, regardless of spray volume. However, a delay of just one or two days led to a significant reduction in efficacy. The fungus, once established, is much harder to eradicate.

Furthermore, the spray volume played a crucial supporting role. While the 0-day delay worked well with both volumes, in the scenarios with a 1 or 2-day delay, the higher spray volume (2.0 gal/1000 ft²) consistently provided better control than the low volume. The higher volume acts like a more thorough delivery system, ensuring better canopy penetration and more uniform coverage of every grass blade, which is critical when trying to stop an advancing infection.

Data Tables: A Closer Look at the Numbers

Table 1: The Impact of Application Delay

(Dollar Spot Severity (% Area Affected) 14 Days After Application)

Application Delay Low Spray Volume (0.5 gal/1000 ft²) High Spray Volume (2.0 gal/1000 ft²)
0 Days 0.5% 0.2%
1 Day 5.8% 2.1%
2 Days 12.4% 8.7%
Untreated 25.5% 25.5%

Description: This table clearly shows that any delay in application increases disease severity. The high spray volume consistently reduces severity compared to the low volume when there's a delay.

Table 2: The Economic & Environmental Payoff

(Estimated Number of Additional Fungicide Applications Needed for Acceptable Control)

Initial Strategy Likely Need for Re-spray
0-Day Delay 0-1
1-Day Delay 2-3
2-Day Delay 3-4

Description: A delayed initial application doesn't just fail to control the disease; it triggers a cycle of more frequent, costly, and environmentally taxing sprays to regain control.

Table 3: The Ideal Early Curative Strategy

Timing Spray Volume Expected Outcome
Immediate (0-Day) High (2.0 gal/1000 ft²) Excellent Control. Eradicates the pathogen with minimal damage and lowest long-term chemical use.
Immediate (0-Day) Low (0.5 gal/1000 ft²) Good Control. Effective, but slightly less consistent than high volume.
Delayed (1-2 Days) High (2.0 gal/1000 ft²) Moderate Control. Manages the outbreak but does not prevent visible damage.
Delayed (1-2 Days) Low (0.5 gal/1000 ft²) Poor Control. Fails to suppress the disease effectively.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Arsenal Against Dollar Spot

Beyond timing and volume, the choice of fungicide is critical. Superintendents use a "toolkit" of different modes of action to prevent resistance.

Contact Fungicides

Acts as a protective barrier on the leaf surface. The pathogen is killed on contact. Essential for resistance management.

Example: Chlorothalonil

Systemic Fungicides

Absorbed and translocated within the plant, attacking the fungus from the inside. Effective for halting active infections.

Example: Propiconazole

Penetrant Fungicides

Has local systemic activity, moving slightly into the leaf tissue for better rainfastness and coverage than pure contacts.

Example: Fluopyram

Research Tools

Advanced tools like dew monitoring sensors provide real-time data on leaf wetness duration, allowing for perfect timing of applications.

Surfactants Dew Sensors

Conclusion: A New Standard for Turf Defense

The battle against dollar spot is evolving from a reactive war to a strategic special ops mission. The research is clear: the most effective, economical, and environmentally sound strategy is a swift and thorough one.

Key Takeaway

By scouting diligently and applying a robust volume of fungicide at the very first sign of trouble, turf managers can stop dollar spot in its tracks.

This science doesn't just lead to prettier grass; it fosters healthier playing surfaces, reduces overall chemical use, and preserves the perfect game for golfers everywhere. It's a winning formula, one timely drop at a time.