Electrolysis Cleans Water While Harvesting Valuable Nutrients
Every day, billions of gallons of wastewater flow through treatment plants worldwide, carrying a hidden payload: millions of tons of nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients, essential for agriculture, become environmental time bombs when released into waterways, fueling toxic algal blooms that suffocate aquatic ecosystems.
Globally, 80-90% of nitrogen and 50% of phosphorus in domestic wastewater originate from human urine alone 1 . Meanwhile, modern agriculture faces fertilizer shortages and price volatility.
What if we could transform this pollution into valuable resources? Enter electrochemical nutrient recoveryâa revolutionary approach turning waste streams into fertilizer factories while producing clean hydrogen fuel.
At its core, electrochemical nutrient recovery uses electricity to drive chemical transformations in wastewater. When electrodes are submerged in nutrient-rich water:
Release metal ions (e.g., Mg²âº, Fe²âº) from sacrificial electrodes or generate oxidizing species
Produce hydrogen gas (Hâ) and increase pH
Dissolved phosphorus and nitrogen react with metal ions to form solid fertilizers like struvite (MgNHâPOâ) or vivianite (Feâ(POâ)â) that precipitate for collection 1 3 .
| Process | Chemical Reaction | Recovery Product |
|---|---|---|
| Struvite Formation | Mg²⺠+ NHâ⺠+ POâ³⻠â MgNHâPOââ | Premium slow-release fertilizer |
| Vivianite Formation | 3Fe²⺠+ 2POâ³⻠â Feâ(POâ)ââ | Iron-phosphate fertilizer |
| Hydrogen Production | 2HâO + 2eâ» â Hââ + 2OHâ» | Clean fuel source |
Unlike biological treatments that require precise microbial management, electrolysis operates reliably across variable wastewater compositions. It sidesteps the Haber-Bosch processâresponsible for 1% of global COâ emissions during nitrogen fertilizer productionâby directly harvesting reactive nitrogen from waste 2 . Recent breakthroughs have slashed energy needs: urea electrolysis requires just 0.37 volts, 70% lower than conventional water splitting 1 .
A landmark 2025 study directly compared four electrode materialsâaluminum, titanium, ductile iron, and magnesiumâfor simultaneous hydrogen production and nutrient recovery. Researchers spiked secondary wastewater with ammonia, phosphate, and magnesium at concentrations mimicking real-world scenarios (0.033 mol/L and 0.0033 mol/L) 3 .
| Electrode | Hâ Purity (%) | POâ Removal (%) | NHâ Removal (%) | Key Precipitate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ductile Iron | 95.6 | 89 | 32 | Vivianite |
| Aluminum 6061 | 96.1 | 91 | 28 | Berlinite |
| Titanium | 87.9 | 84 | 35 | Minimal precipitation |
| Magnesium | 93.5 | >95 | >90 | Struvite |
Magnesium electrodes emerged as clear winners, achieving >95% phosphate removal and >90% ammonia reduction while generating high-purity hydrogen (93.5%). Microscopy revealed elegant struvite crystals forming spontaneously during electrolysis. Iron electrodes produced vivianite but struggled with nitrogen removal. Titanium, while corrosion-resistant, showed poor nutrient recovery due to minimal ion release 3 .
Struvite crystals formed during electrolysis
Vivianite crystals from iron electrodes
Laboratory electrolysis setup
| Material/Equipment | Function | Real-World Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sacrificial Magnesium Anode | Releases Mg²⺠ions to form struvite; increases pH | >90% P recovery from urine 1 |
| Biochar Substrate | Provides surface for crystal growth; hosts denitrifying bacteria | Boosts TN removal by 53% 5 |
| Constant Current Supply | Maintains stable reaction rates; optimizes energy use | Key for viable Hâ production economics |
| Micro-Gas Chromatograph | Analyzes Hâ purity; detects contaminant gases (e.g., chloramines) | Measures gas composition to 0.1% accuracy |
| Sodium Hydroxide (0.1 M) | Controls electrolyte pH; prevents chlorine interference in low-salinity water | Critical for urea electrolysis 1 |
Essential for struvite formation, these sacrificial electrodes provide the magnesium ions needed for nutrient recovery.
Complete systems include power supplies, reaction chambers, and monitoring equipment for precise control.
Electrolysis-integrated ecological floating beds (EEFBs) showcase this technology in action. These buoyant systems use Mg-Al alloy anodes and biochar-filled substrate to treat eutrophic water. Results are striking:
increase in total nitrogen removal
jump in phosphorus elimination
enhanced bacterial communities
Electrochemically enhanced bacterial communities drive denitrification 5 .
A 2024 techno-economic analysis revealed that scaling electrolytic nutrient recovery could supply 9% of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer and 32% of phosphorus needs from wastewater alone. With renewable electricity at $0.05/kWh, processing costs drop to $300/ton NaOHâmaking recovered fertilizers cost-competitive 2 .
Despite progress, hurdles remain:
Sacrificial anodes require replacement; coated electrodes (e.g., mixed metal oxides) show promise 4
Ammonia can escape as gas; optimizing pH and current density minimizes losses 4
Co-existing ions (Clâ», SOâ²â») may compete with nutrient recovery reactions 1
Using sunlight to drive electrolysis reactions for off-grid applications
Existing plants in Canada and South Korea produce 500 kg/day of struvite while generating hydrogen
Electrochemical nutrient recovery transforms linear waste streams into circular resource cycles. By turning pollutants into fertilizer and clean fuel, this technology offers more than treatmentâit delivers triple sustainability dividends: reduced emissions, replenished fertilizer supplies, and renewable energy. As research advances electrode durability and system integration, we move closer to a future where wastewater plants are reborn as resource recovery hubs. As one researcher aptly notes, "We're not treating wastewater anymore; we're refining liquid ore."
For further reading, explore the groundbreaking studies in Chemosphere (2021) and Sustainability (2024-2025) that are redefining wastewater's value.